The glittering performance at the heart of a film is usually the one rewarded. It’s what can be called the Anthony Hopkins/Cate Blanchett school of acting in which we are called upon, nay compelled, to laud a great actor at work. Why then do these performances leave one cold? In contrast, some performances are subtle and do not call attention to themselves yet you are certain that you have witnessed a small miracle. The same goes for films.
The subtle, the unfussy, is rarely rewarded. Generally we watch to be dazzled, even if a hollowness lies at the heart of the film or performance.
Two films that I saw last year fall into the unrewarded category. The less flashy of the two is Two Lovers in which a depressive Jewish man is torn between two very different lovers - one a wild, damaged child and the other a warmly sweet Jewish acquaintance. It’s quietly sublime, expert in both setting up emotions and it's Brooklyn locale. And at its heart is an equally quiet and astonishing performance from Joaquin Phoenix. Sure it turns up in critics’ lists here and there but it is hardly an instant recall. Is it the better or the worse for it? It is hard to say. Perhaps it would wilt under the white heat of intense adulation.
The subtle, the unfussy, is rarely rewarded. Generally we watch to be dazzled, even if a hollowness lies at the heart of the film or performance.


Have been trying to watch Two Lovers-my video fellow too recommended it- but unfortunately the only copy they had has been misplaced. Hope he gets a replacement.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed Two Lovers. Many people can relate with the story's imprisoned characters. It's good to see great story-telling still somehow finds the light of day in this glossy world of meagabuck blockbusters. We have a lot to thank to the Weinsteins (owners of Miramax) who are the few producers in Hollywood that have the nuts to invest in edgy projects like these.
ReplyDelete