Daniyal Mueenuddin’s In Other Rooms, Other Wonders is an accomplished book but so quiet in its tone that one hesitates to leap forth as it were and announce to the world at large, “you must read this book!” Even though it is entirely deserving of such an emotion. The short stories, largely set in rural Pakistan and in the drawing rooms of the country’s rich, are beautifully written but underneath the cool and precise prose runs an acute understanding of the life of the characters that populate the book. Rather loosely structured around a zamindar sort called K.K. Harouni, the book is - rather surprisingly for our age - anchored in a feudal way of life where the master’s immense wealth and power flows from land. The preface to the book is a Punjabi saying, “Three things for which we kill - land, women and gold” which pretty much sets the tone. This wealth and land supports a whole ecosystem of employees and hanger-ons, some merely trying to survive, others lording it over their own minor domains and feathering their nests and in one of the stories, nurturing political ambitions. Remarkably the book doesn’t take any sides, though the stories make it clear that everyone in one way or the other pays a price. To my mind the fact that it not a polemic but a study of the mores and morals of a society is one of the strengths of the book. It isn’t that the stories are without compassion; in fact the even narrative only renders poignant the fate of some of the characters. The story “Saleema”, for e.g., ends with one of those lines that suddenly catch at one’s heart when it refers to a child who begs in the streets, one of the “sparrows of Lahore”. “A Spoiled Man” is similarly affecting. A few of the stories, like “Our Lady of Paris” and "Lily” are wholly urban in tone and slightly reminiscent of Jhumpa Lahiri’s stories. I particularly liked Lily, where a society girl marries a farmer but is unable to leave behind her old life. The odd one out in these stories is “About a Burning Girl”, where a judge has to settle a case involving his bearer and the lighthearted first person narrative on how everyone is complicit in “fixing” a case only underlines the horrific nature of the crime (the stove accident so common in the subcontinent). Many of the stories are set in the Punjab and I hadn’t thought much of the natural beauties of Pakistan but here they are in this book, particularly in Lily where the title character and her paramour venture out into a countryside marked by hills and the river Indus. It’s perhaps descriptions of lives like this as well as the structure of the stories that results in Chekhovian comparisons in the book blurb. The comparison is not unjustified.
The title appears to reference Fitzgerald, yet “All the Sad Young Literary Men” is an unpromising title for a book that has its charms. This book on umm- melancholic literary sorts-follows the ambitions of three literary Americans with pronounced reference to both Jewishness (and hence Israel) as well as Russia. Their experiences are necessarily shallow, perhaps even intentionally shallow. There are lots of references to historical events in the context of personal events. In spite of a knowingness to this, it can at times be irritating if an author is setting out the differences between Mensheviks and Bolsheviks and relating it to girl trouble on an American campus. You don’t mind the history but wish it had been more personal e.g. about the non-English speaking immigrant parents of one of the characters who seem to demand a novel of their own. In the end it seemed a bit like a Godard film. It has moments of sly wit, it is acutely political but ultimately it is a tale of young men and their girls served up with a small dose of misogyny.
The title appears to reference Fitzgerald, yet “All the Sad Young Literary Men” is an unpromising title for a book that has its charms. This book on umm- melancholic literary sorts-follows the ambitions of three literary Americans with pronounced reference to both Jewishness (and hence Israel) as well as Russia. Their experiences are necessarily shallow, perhaps even intentionally shallow. There are lots of references to historical events in the context of personal events. In spite of a knowingness to this, it can at times be irritating if an author is setting out the differences between Mensheviks and Bolsheviks and relating it to girl trouble on an American campus. You don’t mind the history but wish it had been more personal e.g. about the non-English speaking immigrant parents of one of the characters who seem to demand a novel of their own. In the end it seemed a bit like a Godard film. It has moments of sly wit, it is acutely political but ultimately it is a tale of young men and their girls served up with a small dose of misogyny.