My first encounter with the culture of thinness was when I started “proper” work in my late twenties and encountered a whole generation of early twenties who spoke an entirely different language on the suitability of their body parts. Suddenly I was surrounded by women who didn’t just speak the language of thin and fat, but wailed about the fat upper arm, the fat thigh and so on. That the waxing and waning of body parts and its sculpting would cause so much anguish was both astonishing and laughable to the 28 year old me steeped in the idea that having a sculpted mind was the most important object of life.
In the years since, the culture of thinness is now so pervasive that no one gives it a second thought. Women and increasingly, men, are all part of the cult of size zero and parents worry about "chubby" babies. The gymnasium is the high temple of the body. The more literal minded governments amongst us would have it
legislated. Indeed thinness has become a medical ideal, the thin are perplexed when they are diagnosed with illness, and the fat are asked to lose a few pounds even when the reasons lie elsewhere.
Thinness has always equated starvation or limited food or increasingly “correct” food. In unfortunate circumstances, it is shorthand for famine, disease and malnutrition. In other circumstances, it suggests self-control and asceticism. Somewhere along the way, in a world which is perceived more and more via visual media, it suggests both self control (the person who eats a “healthy” lettuce sandwich and who is relentlessly physically active) and also an aesthetic ideal.
In the West, the culture of thinness is partially historical, witness the tiny waists that
corsets provided or
flapper girls or the cult of the ethereal beauty from time to time. There doesn’t appear to be any such corresponding notion in India and at least in recent memory, generations of naturally thin women were routinely asked to stack on weight to raise their matrimonial prospects. Still, in my mother’s family where the women are naturally thin, it is a prized possession and they were very much given to casting an appraising eye over anyone who diverged from this ideal. Perhaps they were an aberration, perhaps it is part of the psyche of simian communities to observe and comment on anything outside the standard deviation. I digress, but I think that provided thinness is not a sign of poverty, it remains valued even in cultures that seemingly celebrate curves and lumps.
Thinness is inextricably intertwined with food. And in the past two decades, the discussion on food is both complex and well, abundant. Increasingly there is a food caste system with its own high priests (Obama himself seems to have more than a touch of
gauche hipsterism) and attacks on those
well known empires of gluttony are common. It is a culture in which food and size fetishism is seemingly at its zenith.
Historically, a culture’s anxieties rested on the ideal female body, now thinness is slightly more democratic. Completely unstatistically, it would appear that fewer women gym than men. The female response is usually the lettuce sandwich (or the cabbage diet or the tea diet or a weight pill, a whole industry rests on diets). Men tend to gym and nothing is more symbolic of male narcissism. Again, age 28 seems to have been a watershed – my first encounters with men who obsessively gymmed to – yes – sculpt that thigh, that upper arm and so on.
Mark Greif’s sharp essay, Against Exercise, assailed the modern gym but it is hardly likely to dent subscription numbers. Gymming is also completely different from an outdoor, physical life – as is obvious from a century of representations of masculinity in cinema. It is artificial, intended to embody a cultural ideal.
One of the insidious aspects of popular culture is that one is drawn into criticism of it. For e.g., both sides of the fence will continue discussing female thinness (Vogue perhaps supporting it while making soothing noises of empowerment, the feminist making it part of her polemic and likely facing the tag of hairy, fat, lesbian) even though food and size fetishism are essentially trivial in nature. Perhaps my time is better spent elsewhere. I suppose it’s the ubiquitousness of the topic that gets to one; these days one may not begin any conversation without discussions on weight and exercise - which instantly casts a pall of boredom. More seriously, various friends struggle with their weight and it is a source of embarrassment, their relationship with food instantly conflicted. Exercise can become so important that it precedes any kind of interaction – the interaction itself is not validated unless one is present at it gym buffed. I do not write this in praise of fat or the couch (though I am comfortable with both). And the cult of bootylicious and McWhoppers is equally tedious. I only ask that both be banished from public pulpits, the matter is perhaps best left to the individual.